preview

US Foreign Policy Essay

Decent Essays

Without the presence of a compelling interest to proceed with international treaties, it remains understandable that the US would opt out of institutions such as the Rome Statute. As a cornerstone of the legislation, no country would be able to alter the framework or provide reservations and conditions prompting the US to immediately rescind all discussions. The transnational approach to policy making can account for the historical nature of the US’s decision to implement international policies in order to set the domestic agenda in motion and/or aide in the dissemination of a policy through justifying a broad jurisdiction (Kyl, Jon). Treaties have been widely respected by the US, if and when they are allowed to dominate the process of ratification …show more content…

Under the policy, countries could be subjected to fulfilling demands and obligations from the enforcement committee that potentially could negate the US ability to maintain some level of autonomy. Ratification of this particular treaty would enable regulations on areas ranging from sidewalks to shower rods to be determined by foreign bodies with no direct experience in the countries on the receiving end of the legislations (Kyl, Jon). The result of ratifying would enable foreign ministers the opportunity to dictate the level of spending and punishments for not adequately addressing needs, which is something that the US believes their current judicial system can ensure. In addition, the US’ passing of the Americans with Disabilities Act would potentially be undermined as not substantial enough if a foreign policy were adapted. In light of the Senate vote, President Obama spoke on the ability for CRPD to positively influence other countries to begin the process of bettering their disability policies, but a formal level of compliance remains unnecessary to push this agenda (Kyl,

Get Access