The economic principle used in each statement.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 6P

To determine

The economic principle used in each statement.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Read the following article and then answer the questions that follow: Without question, the most important positive action you can take to prevent illness and disease is exercise. Exercise prevents a long list of diseases that can cause chronic or severe illness, disability, and even death, including cancer, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, and osteoporosis. Exercise also prevents mental health illness and disease disorders, including depression, anxiety, and stress. While some of these disease processes can be reversed with exercise and healthy life-style, some cannot. Preventing them from starting is the number one goal. The most negative lifestyle behaviour is smoking. Smoking contributes to the development of almost all diseases, notably cancer, heart disease, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, and asthma. Smoking has the following negative health effects: lowers immunity, making you more likely to get bronchitis,…

How would you choose between a diamond and a bottle of water in the different scenarios described in the video? You MUST explain your answer using economic concepts you have learned in the course so far. What did you or your family do during the severe shortage of toilet paper at the beginning of the pandemic in 2020? How would you value a bag of 12 toilet paper compared to a diamond back then? Would it be different compared to during normal circumstances? Explain your answer.

Many cities have taxes on products that are considered "bad," like cigarettes and alcohol. These things may be bad for the individual who consumes them (in terms of lowered health), but also imposes costs on society if people who smoke need health care or people who drink cause accidents. Taxes on these sorts of goods are sometimes referred to as "sin taxes." The idea is that taxing the good will cause people to buy less of that bad (sinful) product. Do you think these taxes work well do produce the desired effect of lowering consumption? What factors may cause a tax to work better or worse as far as lowering consumption? Would these factors cause more or less tax revenue to be raised? If the goal is to reduce consumption, does tax revenue even matter? Would a sin tax work as well on other products like sodas? Why or why not? You don't have to answer every one of the questions I posed -- pick a couple/few that are of interest to you. I threw a lot in there to get you…