Concept explainers
A physicist wants to estimate the rate of emissions of alpha particles from a certain source. He makes two counts. First, he measures the background rate by counting the number of particles in 100 seconds in the absence of the source. He counts 36 background emissions. Then, with the source present, he counts 324 emissions in 100 seconds. This represents the sum of source emissions plus background emissions.
- a. Estimate the background rate, in emissions per second, and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
- b. Estimate the sum of the source plus background rate, in emissions per second, and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
- c. Estimate the rate of source emissions in particles per second, and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
- d. Which will provide the smaller uncertainty in estimating the rate of emissions from the source: (1) counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds, or (2) counting the background for 100 seconds and the source plus the background for 200 seconds? Compute the uncertainty in each case.
- e. Is it possible to reduce the uncertainty to 0.03 particles per second if the background rate is measured for only 100 seconds? If so, for how long must the source plus background be measured? If not, explain why not.
a.
Estimate the background rate in emissions per second.
Find the uncertainty in the estimate.
Answer to Problem 20E
The estimate of the background rate in emissions per second is 0.36
The uncertainty in the estimate is 0.06.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
There are 36 background emissions in 100 seconds in the absence of source and 324 emissions in the presence of source.
Calculation:
The random variables X is defined as the number of background events counted in 100 seconds. The background rate is denoted as
The estimate
The sample concentration
Substitute
Thus, the estimate is 0.36.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the estimate is 0.06.
b.
Estimate the sum of the source plus background rate in emissions per second.
Find the uncertainty in the estimate.
Answer to Problem 20E
The estimate of the sum of the source plus background rate in emissions per second is 3.24.
The uncertainty in the estimate is 0.18.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The random variable Y is defined as the numbers of events both background and source counted in 100 seconds.
The estimate
Then Y follows Poisson with parameter,
The sample concentration
Substitute
Thus, the estimate is 3.24.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the estimate is 0.18.
c.
Estimate the rate of source emissions in particles per second and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
Answer to Problem 20E
The estimate of rate of source emissions in particles per second is 2.88.
The uncertainty in the estimate is 0.19
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The source rate is denoted as as
The rate of source emissions in particles per second is,
The sample concentration
Substitute
Thus, the estimate is 2.88.
Both
The uncertainty in
Substitute
Thus, the uncertainty in the estimate is 0.19.
d.
Identify which will provide the smaller uncertainty in estimating the rate of emissions from the source, counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds or counting the background for 100 seconds and the source plus the background for 200 seconds.
Compute the uncertainty in each case.
Answer to Problem 20E
The counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds has smaller uncertainty than counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds.
The uncertainty in the case of counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds is 0.15.
The uncertainty in the case of counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds is 0.14.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Case 1:
If counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
Then,
Substitute
Thus, the uncertainty in this case is 0.15.
Case 2:
If counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds.
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
The uncertainty in
Replacing
Thus, the uncertainty in the
Then,
Substitute
Thus, the uncertainty in this case is 0.14.
Thus, it can be seen that the counting the background only for 100 seconds and the background plus the source for 200 seconds has smaller uncertainty than counting the background only for 150 seconds and the background plus the source for 150 seconds.
e.
Check whether it is possible to reduce the uncertainty to 0.03 particles per second if the background rate is measured for only 100 seconds. If so find how long must be the source plus background be measured. If not, explain the reason.
Answer to Problem 20E
It is not possible to reduce the uncertainty to 0.03 particles per second if the background rate is measured for only 100 seconds.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
If the background emissions are counted for 100 seconds and the source plus background is counted for N seconds.
Then uncertainty in the estimate of the source rate is,
If one increase the value of N then the estimate of the source rate must be greater than
Thus, an estimate of source rate must be always greater than 0.03.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Statistics for Engineers and Scientists
- In 1906, San Francisco experienced an intense earthquake with a magnitude of 7.8 on the Richter scale. In 1989, the Loma Prieta earthquake also affected the San Francisco area, and measured 6.9 on the Richter scale. Compare the intensities of the two earthquakes.arrow_forwardIn 2014, Chile experienced an intense earthquake with a magnitude of 8.2 on the Richter scale. In 2014, Los Angeles also experienced an earthquake which measured 5.1 on the Richter scale. Compare the intensities of the two earthquakes.arrow_forwardA driver of a car stopped at a gas station to fill up his gas tank. He looked at his watch, and the time read exactly 3:40 p.m. At this time, he started pumping gas into the tank. At exactly 3:44, the tank was full and he noticed that he had pumped 10.7 gallons. What is the average rate of flow of the gasoline into the gas tank?arrow_forward
- Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:Cengage
- Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1AlgebraISBN:9780395977224Author:Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. ColePublisher:McDougal LittellTrigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning