The role of Government coerce in maximizing economic efficiency.
Explanation of Solution
When the government is allowed to coerce in the economy during some situations, it will help the economy to maximize the economic efficiency. The market system has the inherent problem for market failure. The market failure can be handled by the introduction of the public goods which will enforce the positive externalities.
The government can easily identify the unethical practices in the economy such as fraud and extortion etc. when the government is invested with the right to coerce; it can correct the unethical practices. It will help to reduce the risks associated with markets. Thus, investing the government with the right to coerce in the economy will help to maximize the economic efficiency.
Concept introduction:
Economic efficiency: The economic efficiency is a situation in which all the economic resources are being efficiently utilized and the resource wastage is minimized.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- QUESTION 16 16. Is the total expenditure of revenue on a government program (revenue collected by a tax) the full measure of the program's cost to society? O a) Yes. O b) No, because the benefit to society always exceeds the dollar cost of government programs. O c) No, because this does not include the efficiency cost of collecting the tax revenue. O d) No, because it does not include the cost of program administration and losses due to corruption.arrow_forwardA few hundred U.S. sugar makers lobby the U.S. government each year to make sure that the government taxes imported sugar at a high rate. They do so because the policy drives up the domestic price of sugar and increases their profits. It is estimated that the policy benefits U.S. sugar producers by about. $1 billion per year while costing U.S. consumers upwards of $2 billion per year. Which of the following concepts apply to the U.S. sugar tax? a. Political corruption. b. Rent-seeking behavior. c. The collective-action problem. d. The special-interest effect.arrow_forward(Butterworth) Mrs. Butterworth Maple Syrup budgets its marketing efforts using competitive parity. Its current market share and share of voice are both 42%. With the release of a new cannabis- Infused flavor, Mrs. Butterworth wants to get its market share even higher. If Mrs. Butterworth wants to increase its market share to 48%, how many additional share of voice points do they need? O 12 O75 O 10.5arrow_forward
- Suppose that the demand and supply functions for a good are given as follows: Demand: O600-SP Supply: O= 300+4P Suppose now that government imposes $2 tax perunit of output on sellers. What is the burden on buyers 12 27 15arrow_forward20 18 S 16 14 12 10 8 D 4 2 0 + 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Quantity Suppose that supply and demand at a market are represented by curves S and D at the figure above (notice that the vertical axis grid has increments of $2) and then a tax of $6 dollars per unit is imposed on buyers. What is the tax burden on the sellers? $8 $6 $4 $2 Pricearrow_forwardSuppose that a product is produced in three factories X, Y and Z. It is known that factory X produces thrice as many items as factory Y, and that factories Y and Z produce the same number of items. Assume that it is known that 3 per cent of the itenis produced by each of the factories X and Z are defective while 5 per cent of those manufactured by factory Y are defective. All the items produced in the three factories are stocked, and an item of product is selected at random. (i) What is the probability that this item is defective? (ii) If an item selected at random is found to be defective, what is the probability that it was produced by factory X, Y and Z respectively?arrow_forward
- Suppose it is a well-known fact that among ten-year old Ford F-150s, half the trucks are good and half of them are lemons. Suppose that it is also known to all parties that a good truck is worth $8,000 to current owners and $10,000 to potential buyers. A bad truck, on the other hand, is only worth $1,000 to current owners and $2,000 to potential buyers. Throughout, assume that buyers are risk-neutral. 4) Suppose that after much haggling, the current owner is willing to let her truck go for $6,000. What is the most likely implication? a) The truck is a lemon. b) The buyer is an excellent negotiator. c) It's a mutually beneficial transaction.arrow_forwardQuestion 5: Combined state and federal taxes on gasoline average around 50 cents per gallon, and these taxes are statutorily levied on gasoline sellers. Because the demand for gasoline is relatively inelastic compared to the supply of gasoline: buyers likely do not bear much of the actual burden because it is statutorily levied on sellers who must submit the tax payments. sellers likely bear most of the actual burden of the tax through lower gasoline prices. O the net price received by sellers after they pay taxes likely falls by almost the full amount of the tax. O buyers likely bear most of the actual burden of the tax through higher gasoline prices.arrow_forwardLet's see whether quadratic voting can avoid the paradox of voting that arose in Table 5.3 when using 1p1v in a series of paired-choice majority votes. To reexamine this situation using quadratic voting, the table below presents the maximum willingness to pay of Garcia, Johnson, and Lee for each of the three public goods. Notice that each person's numbers for willingness to pay match her or his ordering of preferences (1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice) presented in Table 5.3. Thus, Garcia is willing to spend more on her first choice of national defense ($400) than on her second choice of a road ($100) or her third choice of a weather warning system ($0). TABLE 5.3 Paradox of Voting Preferences Public Good Garcia Johnson Lee National defense 1st choice 3d cholce 2d cholce Road 2d cholce 1st choice 3d cholce Weather warning system 3d choice 2d choice 1st choice Election Voting Outcomes: Winner 1. National defense vs. road National defense (preferred by Garcia and Lee) 2. Road vs.…arrow_forward
- Bob, Eric, and Kenji are fishermen who live next to a lake that is open to fishing; in other words, anyone is free to use the lake for fishing. Assume that these men are the only three fishermen who fish in this lake and that the lake is large enough for all three fishermen to fish intensively at the same time. Each year, the fishermen choose independently how many fish to catch; specifically, they choose whether to fish intensively (that is, to place several fishing lines in the water for long periods of time, which hurts the sustainability of the lake if enough people do it) or to fish nonintensively (which does not hurt the sustainability of the lake). None of them has the ability to control how much the others fish, and each fisherman cares only about his own profitability and not about the state of the lake. Assume that as long as no more than one fisherman fishes intensively, there are enough fish to restock the lake. However, if two or more fish intensively, the lake will become…arrow_forwardQUESTION 30 Which of the following is NOT true of state constitutions in the United States? O All state constitutions divide their power between three branches: legislative, judicial, and executive. O All states but one have a bicameral legislative body. O All state constitutions allow for initiative, referendum, and recall, democratizing the law-making process. O Early state constitutions favored legislatures over the executive and judicial branches. QUESTION 31 The first elected assembly in American history was: O Massachusetts State Legislature Virginia House of Burgesses O Maine State Senate New York Town Council QUESTION 32 True or False: The United States Constitution is a compact between sovereign states and the federal government. O True O Falsearrow_forward1. Recall the regulation model where legislators apply regulations to garner votes. Votes are a function of producer utility (UR ) and consumer utility (UC ). The legislator’s vote/utility function is V = V(UR , UC ). If U R = R, and U C = K – R – L, where K is a constant and R and L are the typical monopoly versus competitive market outcome below. Obviously, both U R and U C are affected by the eventual price (P) set by the legislator because both R and L are affected by that price. (a) Now suppose the demand equation is given by P = 100 - Q , and MC = $20. Write R as a function of the price and show that the price that maximizes producer utility is $60. (b) Given the MC and demand equation above, find the maximum possible consumer surplus (hint: this will be when the market is competitive). (c) Now suppose that (in addition to the information in parts d and e), the legislator gets votes according to V (U R, U C ) = 3U R + U C . Find the price that maximizes the legislator’s votes.arrow_forward