Today I am here to take about Ethos, pathos, and Logos and how my discourse community influenced my use of these devices to join other communities. If you do not know what a discourse community is, then it is a group of people who share knowledge of a particular topic, similar backgrounds and experiences etc. my discourse community was High school broadcasting which for most students they would never join because it is a very tech-savvy class. At our school the announcements were not done by an administrator, we had video feed to every classroom in which the broadcasting class would do the news and create humorous shorts to inform and entertain anyone who was watching .Our job as a class was to inform students on a day to day basis, …show more content…
As well about half the students did not take us seriously. So with those in mind we had to build up our credibility. In the beginning of the year we had to start with factual pieces which we brought the students peers to react to videos like the iPhone 6 plus bend test in which I was in charge of. We got great reactions and we got students to actually watch the show. As well as showing quotes from important people and/or organizations. Students would actually believe and understand what we were showing and were being informed. On top of that we got each episode checked for credible by administers which we always passed. From these experience in broadcasting I learned how to use ethos quite effectively. Broadcasting taught me that without ethos you do not have anywhere to begin. If no one sees that you are credible then no one will listen to you in your discourse community. It is important to show credibility without there is nowhere to start. This transferred to my own way of using ethos to in the beaginnig show and strengthen my credibility early on so people keep listening.
It is easy to just say a few facts but as our audience are high school students we had to gain their attention via aesthetic appeal. When I mean is keep high school students interested in the show and not go on their phones. If we could not connect to them then I would utterly make us useless that is why we use pathos to keep the
Immigration is a complex and multifaceted issue that faces the US. In his film, Sin Nombre (2009), director Cary Fukunaga aims to juxtaposition the issue of immigration with the issue of gang violence in Mexico, and show the difficulties immigrants face by giving his audience an insider’s perspective into the experience of immigrating to the United States from Honduras. He does this through a variety of characters; most notably Willie and Sayra. Fukunaga did extensive research on life in the Mara Salvatrucha gang and the process of immigrating to America, in order to make his film realistic and authentic. The result is a movie that not only shows immigration in a way that evokes empathy and enforces the humanity of immigrants in the viewer’s mind, but also gives the viewer a look into the realities of being in a gang. Through the use of strong characters, powerful dialogue and vivid imagery, Fukunaga uses pathos to put a human face to the issue of immigration, logos to inform and give his audience context about the issues the film addresses, and ethos to establish his credibility and make the film believable.
In Neil Postman’s novel, Amusing Ourselves to Death, he argues that rationality in America has become dictated by television. Through the use of ethos, pathos, and logos, Postman demonstrates that his claim is valid and reliable. These are three forms of persuasion that are used to influence others to agree with a particular point of view. Ethos, or ethical appeal, is used to build an author’s image. Ethos establishes a sense of credibility and good character for the author (Henning). Pathos, or emotional appeal, involves engaging “an audience's sense of identity, their self-interest, their emotions” (Henning). If done correctly, the power of emotions can allow the reader to be swayed to agree with the author. Logos, or logical appeal,
As Meredith Grey, my fictional idol from Grey’s anatomy would say, “Progress looks like a bunch of failures”. A main focus of this semester was learning our audience, and convincing people of things through writing and or visuals using ethos pathos and or logos. I did not see the connections of any of my papers from the first to second semester at first. But my memoir from the first semester and my campaign project from this semester both use pathos, emotion. For me it was easiest to write about the pathos, but the ethos and logos part was out of my reach. I left some of my comfort writing the campaign paper using all 3 and it gave me a better understanding as a writer to keep in mind who am I talking to, what message am I trying to get across
The three approach types are ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is when you have chosen your approach which is the tone of the paper. Pathos is when you have your emotional appeal for your paper. This to me is the most important part of the paper. Logo is your source or logic providing evidence of your rebuttal.
Ethos, pathos, and logos are all devices that Barbara Ehrenreich effectively uses throughout her novel Nickel and Dimed to prove that America needs to address the commonly overlooked issue of poverty within every community. It is important that she uses all three devices because they help support her argument by increasing her credibility, connecting to the readers’ emotions, and appealing to their sense of logic. The combination of these devices puts a sense of urgency on the problem Ehrenreich is addressing and therefore creates an effective argument.
The ability to challenge and question texts continuously is a skill that is essential to have as a student. From an academic perspective, analyzing written works is often done by recognizing the ethos, pathos, and logos that is commonly embedded by the author in an argumentative piece. This method of writing is frequently used to persuade the audience to believe in a specific side of an argument. Authors use ethos to gain trust from an audience by establishing credibility. Pathos is used in text to sway the audience by using tugging at the emotions of the audience and lastly, logos is integrated into writing with the purpose of using facts, research, and statistics in the argument. The text that will be analyzed in this essay is written by
Persuading someone could be hard, especially if they are close minded. I know that when persuading someone, I have to know the person whom I am trying to persuade because people are persuaded differently. If I end up not knowing the person, I usually tend to lean toward ethos or pathos. Most people are connected with their emotional side, which is what mode of persuasion I usually use anyways. When I want something and I ask my mom for whatever it is I want. I start off by saying on how it will make my life better, this is the logos mode of persuasion, and seven times out of ten it works because I know who i'm trying to persuade. As I said before if you are trying to persuade someone you have to know who you are talking to. You
In this essay, I will closely examine the role of ethos, pathos, and logos as they were utilized in the 1992 Presidential Debate video clip. Throughout Clinton and Bush’s debates, they used the three options of persuasion effectively and discretely; however, it is evident that out of the three ways of persuasion, the candidates used ‘pathos’ because of the content they were providing. It was apparent that Bill Clinton was more prepared to display forms of persuasion than George H.W. Bush was because Clinton had prior experience dealing with lower income people. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will explain and analyze how each candidate made use of the three forms of persuasion: logos, pathos, and ethos.
Before the building of architectural achievements such as the Roman Colosseum, the Taj Mahal, and the Windsor Castle, a Greek philosopher named Aristotle had created the three pillars of persuasive speech over 2,000 years ago. These three pillars are known as ethos, logos, and pathos. The architectural feats mentioned above had been created to last and withstand demolition from external forces such as the weather, aging, and cracking/erosion. Just like these buildings are structured, an argument needs to be well put together so it cannot be torn apart. This resulted in the creation of the three pillars. In the reading of Monstrous Beginnings, the author, W. Scott Poole, uses Aristotle’s three pillars attempting to convince the reader that among
The first paragraph reflects a tone of disbelief and confusion. Disbelief is expressed in this line, “I had never thought that a person’s ethnicity was ever important in this country”. It expresses disbelief as the narrator never thought ethnicity was important in today’s world and it turned out that it was important. This next line expresses confusion, “I don’t know exactly how to take those comments”. It expressed confusion over the statements made back at the narrator as the narrator is not sure how to take these comments.
Overall, pathos and logos were the main stars of this piece of writing. A good balance of both were needed to really make this sermon a hit. A good amount of emotion, evened out by some logic helped my sermon to be credible and emotionally gripping. Many people came to me after church to tell me that my sermon brought them to tears. From that I knew that my use of pathos had worked. But also people came to me and said that the information I presented made them change the way they looked at certain things. They told me that the ideas challenged their thinking, and I knew that my use of logos worked. It is always a good idea to have a balance of ethos, pathos and logos in every piece of writing you do. It hits so many areas of your mind at the
Dr. Donald Kaberuka and Edward Green both answered no to the question of will money solve Africa’s problems. (Kaberuka 4; Green 5) However, their positions split by having different reasons money will not save Africa.
In Zadie Smith’s essay “Generation Why”, Smith uses many types of persuasive tactics to convince the readers that Facebook or social media is ruining the generations. Her goal was to give the readers a distinct perspective on how they perceive the social networks. Throughout the essay you may find her words to be offensive or sarcastic, but she still manages to get her point across. However, three specific tactics stood out to me. They are ethos, pathos and logos. I read this article by Big Fish Presentations called “3 Ways to Persuade Your Audience.” In the article, the Big Fish presenters talked mainly on the topic of ethos, pathos and logos. They stated, “When used effectively, these three appeals can be powerful tools for achieving a speaker’s persuasive goal.” However, I feel to believe that Zadie Smith did not execute all three of them for these tactics to be successful or effective in her essay. There are many distinguishable ways that she could have utilized ethos, pathos and logos. However, the manner that she went about it was unexploited.
Ethos, pathos and logos are around us everywhere and used by almost everyone, even by ordinary youtubers. Ethos are the use of techniques to create credibility and trustworthiness to the audience. These techniques can simple such as showing you are a kind and good person, building trust; or more complex such as providing proof to why you are experienced in the topic you are discussing, making you creditable. Pathos is the emotional appeal present in your argument or topic and the connections you make to your audience. You can have strong pathos by choosing strong words with big emotional pulls, using analogies and metaphors, and humor. The last major part of strong arguments that youtubers commonly use are logos. Logos are ways of convincing an audience or viewer with logical reasoning
Piano notes hit the sidewalks outside a large, brick building in a small suburban town. The structure is a high school, the home to many youthful memories and firsts. A boy and a girl lock eyes on the courtyard and a soft smile develops across each of their faces. The sound of the acoustic guitar flows into the setting. Click, she spills her books in the middle of the hallway, mortified as the same boy offers her help and a piece of Extra gum. Click, they are in the car, sharing their first kiss and a piece of gum as sparks and giggles flow between them. Click, the smell of grass and trees surrounds the couple as they laugh and run around outside, truly in love. Click, prom and graduation pass and the couple is now moving in together, disagreeing but later compromising and sharing a piece of gum. Click, she leaves for a work related trip, and, as their hands detach, his heart slowly breaks. Nonetheless, they share a piece of Extra. She eventually comes home to a gallery filled with drawings of their precious memories of the locked eyes in the courtyard and their prom. She spins to see him on one knee proposing with all the reminiscences and love surrounding them. The Extra advertisement campaign effectively connected their product to the audience by using pathos, rather than ethos and logos, and by utilizing revelations evoked by emotion, story progression, and hidden meaning in music and lyrics.