EBK PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS (SECON
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780393616149
Author: Mateer
Publisher: W.W.NORTON+CO. (CC)
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 4SP
To determine
The question answering and the dominant strategy.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
You have just played rock, paper, scissors with your friend. You chose scissors and he chose paper, so you won. Is this a Nash equilibrium? Explain why or why not.
Economics
Game theory: Consider a collective action game
with thirty individuals (N = 30). When the number
of participants in the joint project is n, each
individual, including shirkers, receives a benefit of
B(n) = 18n and each participant incurs a cost of
C(n) = 32 – 2n. Please answer the questions I am
asking!
1. Find all of the Nash equilibria, both stable and
unstable ones.
2. Find the socially optimal outcome.
3. Check if any of the Nash equilibria is socially
optimal. Explain your answer.
A Nash Equilibrium is the equilibrium of a game in which;
Both players get the largest payoff amount
Both players get the best payoff independent of what the other players choices are
Both player, with the knowledge of what the other players possible moves are, do not have incentive to deviate from their strategy
There is incomplete information of the game and each player makes the move that is best for them and their payoff outcome
Chapter 13 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS (SECON
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Game Theory and Strategic Choices - End of Chapter Problem Your instructor challenges you to solve this classic economics thought experiment called the stag hunt: Suppose you and a hunting partner are hunting for food to feed your families in a post-apocalyptic world with no stores, farms, or trade. You lay a trap for a deer that will provide a large number of calories for your two families to continue to survive. While waiting, you both spot a hare running through the trap. If you chase after the hare, you'll catch it but you will scare any wildlife in the area and you won't catch the deer you were waiting for. The hare only provides a small amount of calories for your own family and none for your partner's family. Use the payoff matrix to answer the question. You hunt the deer You hunt the hare Your friend hunts the deer Your payoff is 5 Your friend's payoff is 5 Your payoff is 2 Your friend's payoff is A Your friend hunts the hare Your payoff is A Your friend's payoff is 2 Your…arrow_forwardIn 'the dictator' game, one player (the dictator) chooses how to divide a pot of $10 between herself and another player (the recipient). The recipient does not have an opportunity to reject the proposed distribution. As such, if the dictator only cares about how much money she makes, she should keep all $10 for herself and give the recipient nothing. However, when economists conduct experiments with the dictator game, they find that dictators often offer strictly positive amounts to the recipients. Are dictators behaving irrationally in these experiments? Whether you think they are or not, your response should try to provide an explanation for the behavior.arrow_forwardBurger King has introduced new strategy by reducing the price of its Whopper by 75 percent if customers also purchased french fries and a soft drink. Nevertheless, the sales dropped within two weeks. Based on your knowledge on game theory, what do you think had happened?arrow_forward
- Nash equilibrium refers to the optimal outcome of a game where there is no incentive for the players to deviate from their initial strategy. An individual (or player) can receive no incremental benefit from changing actions, assuming other players remain constant in their strategies. Given this premise, can there be a no Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardecnomics game theoryarrow_forwardCome up with a diagram (i.e. using a two-player decision matrix such as the Prisoner’s Dilemma) for an original game theory/prisoner's dilemma scenario (either in business, politics, or your own personal life), and explain what would be the most likely outcome of the scenario you have chosen.arrow_forward
- Consider a game where player A moves first, choosing between Left and Right. Then, after observing player A’s choice, player B moves next choosing between Up and Down. Which of the following is true? This is a game where players A and B have the same number of strategies. Player A will get a higher payoff than player B as A moves first. This is game will only have one Nash equilibrium. This is a game of perfect information.arrow_forwardThree married couples in the state of Maryland—Bob and Carol, Ted and Alice, and Ross and Mike (remember, same-sex marriage is legal in the state of Maryland)—are thinking about renting a boat to go sailing on the Chesapeake Bay. The cost of a boat rental is $600. Each of the three couples puts some amount of money in an envelope. Thus, each player in this game is a couple. If the total amount collected is at least $600, then the boat is rented. If the amount collected is more than $600, then the money left over after renting the boat is spent on wine. If the total amount collected is less than $600, then they do not rent the boat, and the money is spent on a dinner. Assume the benefit to a couple from the boat trip is 400, the benefit from each dollar spent on wine is 50 cents, the benefit from each dollar spent on dinner is 40 cents, and the personal cost of the contribution to a couple equals the amount of contribution. For example, if the boat is rented, $50 of wine is purchased…arrow_forwardThis question is about game theory in economics. please show all your workings and answersarrow_forward
- a.) Suppose you manage a large company’s marketing department and are responsible for deciding whether or not to advertise in the Super Bowl. Your team of analysts estimate that for each advertisement, your firm would generate $6 million in additional revenue for the company. It cost $7 million to run a 30-second advertisement. Therefore, your company would expect to lose $1 million in profit for each advertisement. b.) Depict this situation with a game theory payoff matrix. Your company (A) and a major competitor (B) have two potential strategies: to advertise or to not advertise during the Super Bowl. The payoffs in each cell represent the change in firm profits from advertising. Create payoffs in each cell such that the Nash equilibrium is that both firms advertise despite having a higher profit if neither firm advertisedarrow_forward4.2. Game theory (Prisoner's dilemma). Often, many sectors in an economy have two main rivals, battling it out in the marketplace. There can be rivalry such as between Apple and Samsung in Phones and Laptops. Suppose Apple plans to cut its price. Samsung will likely follow suit to retain its market share. This may end up with low profits for both companies. A price drop by either company may thus be construed as defecting since it breaks an implicit agreement to keep prices high and maximize profits. Thus, if Apple drops its price but Samsung continues to keep prices high, Apple is defecting, while Samsung is cooperating (by sticking to the spirit of the implicit agreement). In this scenario, Apple may win market share and earn incremental profits by selling more. Assume that the incremental profits that accrue to Apple and Samsung are as follows: If both keep prices high (Cooperate), profits for each company increase by AED200 million (because of normal growth in demand). If one drops…arrow_forwardThis question is from game theoryarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning