Microeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260507140
Author: David C. Colander
Publisher: McGraw Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 3IP
(a)
To determine
The Nash equilibrium of the payoff matrix.
(b)
To determine
The difference in the play of matrix if it is symmetric.
(c)
To determine
The reason why the players cooperate 60 times out of 100 games.
(d)
To determine
The choice of players when playing the 100th game.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that you and a friend play a matching pennies game in which each of you
uncovers a penny. If both pennies show heads or both show tails, you keep both. If one shows
heads and the other shows tails, your friend keeps them. Show the pay- off matrix. What, if
any, is the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium to this game? Is there a mixed-strategy Nash
equilibrium? If so, what is it?
Use the following payoff matrix for a one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. a. Determine the Nash equilibrium outcomes that arise if the players make decisions independently, simultaneously, and without any communication. Which of these outcomes would you consider most likely? Explain. b. Suppose player 1 is permitted to “communicate” by uttering one syllable before the players simultaneously and independently make their decisions. What should player 1 utter, and what outcome do you think would occur as a result? c. Suppose player 2 can choose its strategy before player 1, that player 1 observes player 2’s choice before making her decision, and that this move structure is known by both players. What outcome would you expect? Explain.
Use the following payoff matrix to answer the questions below.
Cooperate
Defect
1
Cooperate
100, 100
40, 125
Defect
125, 40
50, 50
Which player (if any) has a Dominant Strategy?
[ Select ]
What is the Nash Equilibrium of this game? [ Select ]
Does this game satisfy the definition of a prisoner's dilemma? [ Select ]
Chapter 20 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 20.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 20.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 20.A - Netflix and Hulu each expects profit to rise by...Ch. 20.A - Prob. 2QECh. 20 - Prob. 1QECh. 20 - Prob. 2QECh. 20 - Prob. 3QECh. 20 - Prob. 4QECh. 20 - Prob. 5QECh. 20 - Prob. 6QECh. 20 - Prob. 7QECh. 20 - Prob. 8QECh. 20 - Prob. 9QECh. 20 - Prob. 10QECh. 20 - Prob. 11QECh. 20 - Prob. 12QECh. 20 - Prob. 13QECh. 20 - Prob. 14QECh. 20 - Prob. 15QECh. 20 - Prob. 16QECh. 20 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 6QAPCh. 20 - Prob. 1IPCh. 20 - Prob. 2IPCh. 20 - Prob. 3IPCh. 20 - Prob. 4IPCh. 20 - Prob. 5IPCh. 20 - Prob. 6IPCh. 20 - Prob. 7IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Review Chapter 15, Table 15.4, Prisoner Dilemma. Suppose the game starts with both Jesse and Frank planning to “Stay Mum” in the lower right cell. Discuss how each player would evaluate the situation and decide whether to change decisions. If each player makes decisions to minimize the penalty, in which cell will this game end? Is there a Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardIs the solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game a Nash equilibrium? Why? The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is a Nash equilibrium because no player can improve his or her payoff by changing strategy unilaterally. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is not a Nash equilibrium because players do not end up in the best combination for both. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is not a Nash equilibrium because both players can improve their payoffs by cooperating. The solution to the prisoner’s dilemma game is a Nash equilibrium because it is a noncooperative game in which both players have to expect that the other is purely selfish.arrow_forwardTable 15.4, Prisoner Dilemma. Suppose the game starts with both Jesse and Frank planning to “Stay Mum” in the lower right cell. Discuss how each player would evaluate the situation and decide whether to change decisions. If each player makes decisions to minimize the penalty, in which cell will this game end? Is there a Nash equilibrium?arrow_forward
- You have just played rock, paper, scissors with your friend. You chose scissors and he chose paper, so you won. Is this a Nash equilibrium? Explain why or why not.arrow_forwardNash equilibrium refers to the optimal outcome of a game where there is no incentive for the players to deviate from their initial strategy. An individual (or player) can receive no incremental benefit from changing actions, assuming other players remain constant in their strategies. Given this premise, can there be a no Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardLet’s say there are two friends, Adam and Jason who each has two strategies: Share and don’t share notes to classmates a night before final exam. The payoff for each of them is in the above payoff matrix. a) Do you think this game has a dominated strategy equilibrium? Is it a stable equilibrium? Justify your answer. b) Is it worth for both of them to end up sharing notes to others a night before final exam? Justify your answer.arrow_forward
- Chris Evans Party Don't Party Paparazzo Stalk 3,4 1,1 Don't Stalk 4,2 1,2 Suppose a sequential game in which Paparazzo moves first. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? (Stalk; Party if Paparazzo chooses Stalk, and Party if Paparazzo chooses Don't Stalk). (Stalk; Party if Paparazzo chooses Stalk, and Don't Party if Paparazzo chooses Don't Stalk). O (Don't Stalk; Party if Paparazzo chooses Stalk, and Party if Paparazzo chooses Don't Stalk). (Don't Stalk; Party if Paparazzo chooses Stalk, and Don't Party if Paparazzo chooses Don't Stalk).arrow_forwardRefer to the accompanying payoff matrix. Which of the following is a Nash equilibrium? Company A Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1 Company A's Profit: $8 million Company B's Profit: $9 million Company B Company A's Profit: $10 million Company B's Profit: $8 million None of the above, Strategy 2 Company B's Profit: $8 million Company A's Profit: $7 million Company B's Profit: $7 million Company A's Profit: $8 million Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 1. Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 2. Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 2. Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 1.arrow_forwardEconomics Alpha and Beta are the only firms selling gyros in the upscale town of Delphi. Each firm must decide on whether to offer a discount to students to compete for customers. If one firm offers a discount but the other does not then the firm that offers the discount will increase its profit. The figure shows the payoff matrix for this game. Alpha Offer Don't offer Alpha eams S60,000 Alpha eams $20,000 What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Offer Bota earns $60,000 Bota earns $100.000 O A. There is no Nash equilibrium Beta Alpha earns $100.000 Alpha earms $80,000 O B. Beta offers a student discount but Alpha does not Don't OC. Both Alpha and Beta offer a student discount Beta eams $20,000 Beta earns $80,000 offer O D. Alpha offers a student discount but Beta does notarrow_forward
- We consider a game between two players, Alice and Bob. Alice chooses a number x (between -infinity and +infinity), and Bob chooses a number y (between -infinity and +infinity). Alice's payoff is given by the following function: 35 x + 87 x y - 95 x squared. (the last entry is "x squared".) Bob's payoff is given by the following function: 30 y + 42 x y + 75 y squared. (the last entry is "y squared".) Calculate Alice's strategy in the (unique) Nash equilibrium of this game.arrow_forwardConsider the following game: PLAYER 2 Left Middle Right Up 0,0 2,5 5.4 PLAYER 1 Middle 1,2 7,3 4,3 Down 5,5 3, 1 2, 1 Which of the following statements is true? There are two Nash equilibria, and they are both Pareto efficient. There is a unique Nash equilibrium. There are two Nash equilibria, and they are both Pareto inefficient. There are two Nash equilibria, but only one is Pareto efficient. None of these.arrow_forwardUse a matrix to model a two-player game of rock-paper-scissors with payoff of 1 if you win, -1 if you lose, and 0 if you tie. In this game, how many pure-strategies Nash equilibria exist?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning