preview

Sn2 Nucleophilic Substitution Lab Report

Decent Essays

1 and 2) In this experiment, Sn2 nucelophilic substitution between an unknown nucleophile solution and the known reagents benzyl bromide and NaOH occurred to form a benzyl ether product. 3) Refluxing, recrystallization, melting point, and TLC were used to purify and identify the products of the reaction. 4) In order for nucleophilic substitution to take place, an electron pair donor (the nucleophile) and an electron pair acceptor (the electrophile) with a good leaving group must be present. In this experiment, Sn2 nucelophilic substitution occurred. In Sn2 nucelophilic substitution, the nucleophile performs a “backside attack” at the same time the leaving group “leaves”, resulting in an inversion of configuration of the electrophile to form …show more content…

Impure solids both tend melt at a wider range and at a lower temperature than pure solids. Knowing this can help identify the product when given possible melting points. 6) In this experiment, recrystallization was used to separate the compound of interest from any other impurities by dissolving a solid in a proper solvent. A proper solvent doesn’t dissolve the solid at room temperature but does dissolve the solid near its boiling point. It is also important that the proper solvent does dissolve impurities at room temperature but does not dissolve impurities near its boiling point. 7) Thin-layer Chromatography (TLC) was used in the experiment to identify the filtrate. TLC works by applying a sample of the filtrate onto a TLC plate that is partially submerged in a solvent in a closed jar. The filtrate then moves up the plate through capillary action, and the distance that the filtrate moved (the Rf value) is measured. This value is then compared to Rf values measured from given solutions, and the filtrate is identified by matching its Rf to the closest Rf of a given …show more content…

TLC in 9:1 hexanes/ethyl acetate solvent gave Rf Values for given solutions A-F and the filtrate as .102, .061, .122, .347, .298, .404, .426, .064, and .280, respectively. 13) The product obtained was 4-tert-butylbenzylphenolether. The melting point range of the pure, unknown compound (35-44 °C) was closest to the one measured for 4-tert-butylbenzylphenolether (36-51 °C). Also, the scale-like appearance of the unknown solid was very similar to the appearance of 4-tert-butylbenzylphenolether. The NMR spectra solution #33 (the unknown) matched closest to that of 4-tert-butylbenzylphenolether 14) The yield (.468 g) makes sense because it was lower than the theoretical yield calculated (1.57 g). Yield may have been lost because the crystals formed too quickly, causing some of them to be small in size and seep through the filter and into the filtrate. 15) The percent recovery of 55.7% makes sense. The recovery is lower than 100% because the product contained impurities before it was recrystallized, which made it heavier in mass. After recrystallization, these impurities were removed, causing the final pure product to have less mass. These impurities were confirmed to exist through

Get Access