Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
3rd Edition
ISBN: 9781107189638
Author: Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 2.44P
To determine
Prove that, “In one dimension
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Write down the equations and the associated boundary conditions for
solving particle in a 1-D box of dimension L with a finite potential
well, i.e., the potential energy U is zero inside the box, but finite
outside the box. Specifically, U = U₁ for x L. Assuming that particle's energy E is less
than U, what form do the solutions take? Without solving the
problem (feel free to give it a try though), qualitatively compare with
the case with infinitely hard walls by sketching the differences in
wave functions and probability densities and describing the changes
in particle momenta and energy levels (e.g., increasing or decreasing
and why), for a given quantum number.
PROVE: Triangle Inequality We prove Property 5 of abso-
lute values, the Triangle Inequality:
|x + y < |x| + y|
(a) Verify that the Triangle Inequality holds for x = 2 and
y = 3, for x = -2 and y = -3, and for x = -2 and
y = 3.
(b) Prove that the Triangle Inequality is true for all real num-
bers x and y. [Hint: Take cases.]
Starting with the equation of motion of a three-dimensional isotropic harmonic
ocillator
dp.
= -kr,
dt
(i = 1,2,3),
deduce the conservation equation
dA
= 0,
dt
where
1
P.P, +kr,r,.
2m
(Note that we will use the notations r,, r2, r, and a, y, z interchangeably, and similarly
for the components of p.)
Chapter 2 Solutions
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Ch. 2.1 - Prob. 2.1PCh. 2.1 - Prob. 2.2PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.3PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.4PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.5PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.6PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.7PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.8PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.9PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.10P
Ch. 2.3 - Prob. 2.11PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.12PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.13PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.14PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.15PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.16PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.17PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.18PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.19PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.20PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.21PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.22PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.23PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.24PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.25PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.26PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.27PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.28PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.29PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.30PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.31PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.32PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.34PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.35PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.36PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.37PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.38PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.39PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.40PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.41PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.42PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.44PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.45PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.46PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.47PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.49PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.50PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.51PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.52PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.53PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.54PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.58PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.63PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.64P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A particle of mass m confined to an infinite potential well of length L from x= 0 to x=L is in the ground state. (a) Is this state an eigenfunction of the momentum operator, px? Justify your answer. (b) If an observation of momentum is made, what value, or values, could be obtained? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardConsider the function v(1,2) =( [1s(1) 3s(2) + 3s(1) 1s(2)] [x(1) B(2) + B(1) a(2)] Which of the following statements is incorrect concerning p(1,2) ? a. W(1,2) is normalized. Ob. The function W(1,2) is symmetric with respect to the exchange of the space and the spin coordinates of the two electrons. OC. y(1,2) is an eigenfunction of the reference (or zero-order) Hamiltonian (in which the electron-electron repulsion term is ignored) of Li with eigenvalue = -5 hartree. d. The function y(1,2) is an acceptable wave function to describe the properties of one of the excited states of Lit. Oe. The function 4(1,2) is an eigenfunction of the operator S,(1,2) = S;(1) + S,(2) with eigenvalue zero.arrow_forwardBy employing the prescribed definitions of the raising and lowering operators pertaining to the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator: x = ħ 2mω -(â+ + â_) hmw ê = i Compute the expectation values of the following quantities for the nth stationary staten. Keep in mind that the stationary states form an orthogonal set. 2 · (â+ − â_) [ pm 4ndx YmVndx = 8mn a. The position of particle (x) b. The momentum of the particle (p). c. (x²) d. (p²) e. Confirm that the uncertainty principle is satisfied for all values of narrow_forward
- Solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation with appropriate boundary conditions for an infinite square well centered at the origin [V (x) = 0, for -a/2 < x < +a/2; V (x) = 00 otherwise]. Check that your allowed energies are consistent with mine (Equation 2.23), and confirm that your y's can be obtained from mine (Equation 2.24) by the substitution x x - a/2.arrow_forwardDemonstrate that e#ikz are solutions to both H and p, (momentum) for a free particle. Do you expect a difference for a bound particle where V (z) + 0?arrow_forwardPROBLEM 2 Calculate the probability distribution of momenta p for a ld oscillator in the ground state (n = 0). Calculate the mean square dispersions (x2), (p²), and the product (r2)(p²).arrow_forward
- Prove the following commutator identity: [AB, C] = A[B. C]+[A. C]B.arrow_forwardA qubit is initially in state [0). Its state is then transformed by the unitary operation represented by the matrix U ¹ = ¹2 ( √3³ √ ) = √³ (10) (0) + (1¹) (11) + ½ (10) (1| + (1) (01) . a) What is the probability of the qubit to have the value 0 when measured before the transforma- tion? How about the value 1? b) What is the probability of the qubit to have the value 0 when measured after the transforma- tion? How about the value 1? c) Let's say that the qubit is measured after the transformation, and its value is found to be 1. What is the probability of the qubit to have the value 0 immediately after the measurement?arrow_forwardConsider the three functions F (x₁, x2) = eª¹ + x₂; G (x₁, x₂) = x₂eª¹ + x₁e¹² and H = F (x₁, x2) — F(x2, x₁) x1 1 and 2 are particle labels. Which of the following statements are true? Both F and G are symmetric under interchange of particles G is symmetric under interchange of particles but not F OH is anti antisymmetric OF is neither symmetric nor antisymmetricarrow_forward
- Consider a particle in a box of length L with one end coinciding with the origin. It is frequently interesting to know how a system behaves under some disturbance. These disturbances are typically encoded as operators. fd, (æ)Op(x)dx may be interpreted as the probability of finding the system (x) in the eigenfunction , (x) after being acted on by the disturbance Ö. Begin with the system in state n = 1 and compute the probability that the system is found in some state n 1 under the action of the operator Qx, where Q is just a constant. In the case of atomic systems, such operators are known as dipole operators and transitions induced by them are called dipole induced transitions. Repeat this problem with the operator e"/L instead.arrow_forwardConsider the half oscillator" in which a particle of mass m is restricted to the region x > 0 by the potential energy U(x) = 00 for a O where k is the spring constant. What are the energies of the ground state and fırst excited state? Explain your reasoning. Give the energies in terms of the oscillator frequency wo = Vk/m. Formulas.pdf (Click here-->)arrow_forwardSuppose there is a particle with mass m that is projected with energy E = V0 at the potential energy barrier defined in the provided images. Find the most general solution to the time independent Schrodinger equation in the regions x < 0, 0 < x < a, and x > a. Apply the appropriate boundary conditions and determine the transmission coefficient for a particle that is projected at the barrier from the left. Be sure that your result behaves appropriately in the limit a → 0. (Note: The most general solution to a 2nd order differential equation has 2 arbitrary constants; this is true in each of the 3 regions defined in this problem.)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage Learning
University Physics (14th Edition)PhysicsISBN:9780133969290Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. FreedmanPublisher:PEARSONIntroduction To Quantum MechanicsPhysicsISBN:9781107189638Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.Publisher:Cambridge University Press
Physics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9780321820464Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina BrissendenPublisher:Addison-Wesley
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...PhysicsISBN:9780134609034Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart FieldPublisher:PEARSON
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Cengage Learning
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:9780133969290
Author:Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:PEARSON
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:9781107189638
Author:Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:9781337553278
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:9780321820464
Author:Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:Addison-Wesley
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio...
Physics
ISBN:9780134609034
Author:Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:PEARSON